I see.  Well, for whatever it's worth, I too think it
would be very very useful to store those as separate
fields.

-Nate

--- Adam Golding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> well marco was suggesting not storing the number at
> all, which i oppose.
> 
> On 4/22/06, Nathan Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I haven't noticed catalogue numbers changing
> between
> > minor variants of a work like that.  Usually I
> just
> > see (1920 version) or (french version) or
> something
> > like that.
> >
> > But isn't this all moot?  Catalogue numbers are
> pretty
> > essential for "regular" classical works, and there
> > seems to be some consensus that it should be
> stored
> > separately of the track.  If we do that, who cares
> if
> > you add it to an opera?
> >
> > -Nate
> >
> > --- Adam Golding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 4/22/06, Marco Sola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Adam Golding
> > > >
> > > > > lol. you were discussing leaving the opus
> number
> > > out for operas
> > > >
> > > > Ah, sorry.
> > > >
> > > > > but if we leave it out, where does it go?
> > > >
> > > > Nowhere, it's not needed nor useful: it's easy
> to
> > > find an opera by its
> > > > (often very strange) name.
> > > >
> > >
> > > and if you want to know if it's a late or an
> early
> > > opera by the composer?
> > > for me this is some of the most important info
> while
> > > listening to music.
> > >
> > > Ciao
> > > >
> > > > MArco (ClutchEr2)
> > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> > > > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> > > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> > >
> >
>
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> >
>
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
>
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to