Well, the problem here is what one would mean by "necessary". "Variation 1" seems to me a little too terse, but I wanted other users opinions before posting a note to the original modder. Thanks.
2006/5/2, Stefan Kestenholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, so putting it under Jacques Loussier is fine. But what about the > track names? > > > ... Tracks to the composers with as much detail as you deem > > necessary And I thought I wrote a short, and precise e-mail before ;) Enter the track names such that it is clear which work was performed? If your question was about using classical styleguideline, yes definitely (even if it's only for consistency and that the tracks turn up in the database search) --keschte
-- Frederic Da Vitoria _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
