hmm, i'm in 2 minds. one the one hand, [no artist] is essentially for these situations - for works where it is not neccesary to credit a specific artist (eg sound effect CDs). but on the other hand, i suppose you could argue that in many cases the label (or production house, or whatever), is responsible for the sounds, and so the 'artist'.
i don't think that using the label as the artist is the right overall rule, though, because if warner releases a sound effect cd, which is the output of 'super sound effect studios', then they would be better suited as the artist, rather than warner, despite being a company, rather than an "artist". On 19/05/06, Beth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/RecordLabelAsArtist _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
