On 7/4/06, Thomas Tholén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't really have an opinion on "split" or not, I'd just like to pont out that this case is quite far from equivalent with V/A releases. In all cases I can think of V/A releases already have a name, and this is about constructing a (MB purpose) name for something that doesn't already have one.
True. I should've said something like "Various Artists Compilation". Maybe a better argument: if only the artist names are mentioned on the cover, it seems strange to me to add something like 'Split' to the title.
Citerar Jan van Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 7/4/06, Stefan Kestenholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > /me thinks it would be great if you could revisit > > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ReleaseTypeRestructuringProposal > > and bring it into a state where we can just develop this feature in the > most > > straightforward manner. I think it needs some additional work, from that > > point on the discussions about the current release attributes will be > > irrelevant. > > I agree. > > And I'd like to have this proposal implemented regardless whether we > have a release attribute 'Split' or not. I think 'Split' shouldn't be > part of the title, the same as we don't add 'Various Artists' or > something equal to VA releases.
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
