On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 01:10:48PM +0200, Mangled wrote: > >But the situation is completely different. Japanese non-standardness is > >widely supported by people who listen to Japanese music and they tend to > >defend it fiercely. There is no consensus about the French guidelines and > >even many French people themselves aren't using our current ones. How are > >we supposed to get people to use the guidelines when even people who are > >native speakers aren't even using them? The burden of keeping 5000 and > >growing albums in order will be on a just few people, that just won't work. > > No time for hypocrisy: MB stays organised thanks to the work of a > handfull of people (most of them are autoeditors), who are constantly > doing cleanup / documentation work. > Add-albums (hitting my subscriptions) 90% of the time require 1-10 > more edits before looking good to me. This is not different.
The French rules have been like that for over a year, yet the French releases in the database are largely not following them. Either not enough people care about fixing them (which I don't think is really true) or it's just too much work for the people with the knowledge and will to fix them to actually do so. --Nikki _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
