Kuno Woudt wrote:
I'm not entirely certain about the order of (feat.) and (disc #), but
can't think of any examples right now to which the style would apply.
(so i wouldn't veto an RFV to make this ReleaseTitle as it currently
exists official). I guess I would prefer the guideline to be little
less strict, and leave the order as on the cover in such cases.
I also would like to see the feat. order changed to be after subtitles.
One can imagine a 2-disc single where the currently proposal would look
a bit silly, e.g.
Release: Track A (disc 1) (feat. Artist A)
Track 1: Track A (feat. Artist A) (original mix)
Track 2: Track B
Track 3: Track A (feat. Artist A) (Artist B remix)
Release Track A (disc 2) (feat. Artist A)
Track 1: Track A (feat. Artist A) (radio edit)
etc
Additionally, the lack of mention of ExtraTitleInformation or the
fuzziness around it concerns me (as raised at bottom of discussion) - it
is the muddiest area currently, and its current implementation tends to
be ("only if it's mentioned on the disc"), which although I agree with,
creates some clarity issues about ExtraTitle vs SubTitle. The ordering
most certainly needs to include a [ExtraTitleInformation] block,
otherwise we have yet another conflicting style guideline; one which
says it has no place in release titles, and one which says to insert it.
This would be a step backwards imo.
Chad / voiceinsideyou
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
