On Ne, 2007-11-25 at 12:52 -0500, Brian Schweitzer wrote: > > And yes, I do think we can use these even if the release date is the > > same -- the "earliest release" thing is just a trick to avoid link > > clusters, so arbitrarily selecting a "canonical" first among those > > released on the same date would work fine with me. > > > I'd thought of that too, but as you say, it's not quite the same case. > If we were to link this way, with simply one selected (basically at > random) as the "cannonical" first, would anyone find that an > objectionable AR?
It is the same case (by definition): http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/SameTrackRelationshipType "This advanced relationship type indicates that two tracks are absolutely identical." Lukas _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
