> 3. "" Cantata, BWV 17 "Wer Dank opfert, der preiset mich": Part II, V. > Aria "Welch Übermaß der Güte" - Here the whole number is Part II, V. > because BWV 17 is seperated in parts. "" > > Would the opus "Cat # No. #" concept apply here? ie, > "Cantata, BWV 17 Part II "Wer Dank opfert, der preiset mich": V. Aria > "Welch Übermaß der Güte" > Not as I see it, it's still the same work. It's not like, say Beethoven's Op. 14 No. 2 "Moonlight" which is a new sonata with no connection to Op. 14 No. 1.
> 4. Keys section, the German example: --> 'Prélude No. 8 Fis-moll, Op. > 28: Molto agitato' (German) > Something I discussed on CSGD. From what I understand, German is no > different from the other languages, and "in" ought to be there. This > exception for German seems to have stemmed from this example - why are > we leaving out the "in" in German? > > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuideDiscussion?highlight=%28classical%29#head-982eaa4f1d90cc5424ae4b0b6b1cc84fc6c5cd44 > AFAIK that's the way the Germans do it. Ex: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beethoven#Werke_.28Auswahl.29 But I don't know if "in" has to be "forbidden"? > 8. Proper caps instead of sentence caps on the left side of the > colon; arabic and not written numerals on the left side of the colon. > > Which is nicer? The first is correct for how we do it now, but the > 3rd looks nicer and cleaner. (The 2nd isn't as clean, but might still > be preferable): > > Concerto for 2 Pianos, 3 Violins, 2 Horns and Bass in C major > Concerto for 2 pianos, 3 violins, 2 horns and bass in C major > Concerto for two pianos, three violins, two horns and bass in C major > The 2nd looks good to me. -- /symphonick
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
