On Ut, 2008-02-26 at 07:36 -0500, Aaron Cooper wrote: > I disagree with luks. A work title not only identifies a larger > work > but also the individual "movements" of those works. Classical "songs" > don't have "titles", unless you consider common names like "Eroica" a > title.
I wasn't walking about work titles at all, nor about classical "songs". What we have in MB are track titles, which sucks for classical, but that's the way it is. Track titles will always depend on the context in which they are released, so trying to make them absolutely identify musical works in all cases doesn't make sense to me. Reformatting is fine, standardization is fine, but changing the title to something completely different than on the cover isn't (in my opinion). We should wait for actual musical work entities with that. Lukas
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálne podpísaná časť správy
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
