On 4-Mar-08, at 4:48 AM, Leiv Hellebo wrote: > Aaron Cooper wrote: > On the topic of languages, I think we should try to pick one >> language per composer (as we've done with the wiki works lists) > > One language per work in Works lists sounds good. If the composer e.g. > lived abroad and used another language during that period, it's to be > expected that different languages might be best. > > > do >> reduce the duplication. >> > > > If you're talking about removing/merging releases with track > listings in > different languages, then I see no need to reduce duplication: They're > not dupes.
I meant duplication in the works lists. But I do think that releases with identical music recordings but different title languages are duplicates because they duplicate ARs, they duplicate release dates, they duplicate the work to manage titles.......... -Aaron _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
