I'm hoping it is just a typo. The DiscNumber is usually the last thing entered into the ReleaseTitle and the only occasion I can think of where this might not be true is if there are different performers on each disc.
-cooperaa On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Brant Gibbard <bgibb...@ca.inter.net> wrote: > I notice that in http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Classical_Release_Title_Style > there are statements which appear to conflict with one another. > > In the section marked "Structure" there is a schema for the structure of a > classical title which finishes with: > > DiscNumber [[[Disc Title|DiscTitle]]]] [[[Featuring > Artist|FeaturingArtist]]] > > Which is odd, as it is suggesting putting the disc number BEFORE the > featured artists, which is certainly not the way this has been done in the > past, and yet every single example in the "Examples" section that has > multiple discs puts the disc number AFTER the featured artists: > > Die Zauberflöte (Berliner Philharmoniker feat. conductor: Karl Bohm) (disc > 1) > Piano Concertos Nos. 1-5 (New Philharmonia Orchestra feat. conductor: Otto > Klemperer, piano: Daniel Barenboim) (disc 1) > Requiem in D minor / Ave verum corpus / Missa Brevis in D minor (Kölner > Kammerchor & Collegium Cartusianum feat. conductor: Peter Neumann) (disc 1) > > Is this simply a typo in the "Structure" section, or is it really the > intention to change the order? > > A similar structure is given in http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Release_Title > > Brant Gibbard > Toronto, ON > http://bgibbard.ca > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
