Hi everyone,

As the discussion on the previous RFV seems to have been resolved, I am
resubmitting it for veto.
Changes made since the first RFV:

   1. Different example: a Jagger/Richards track, for which the individual
   contributions are unclear, and which do not yet have composer or lyricist
   ARs.
   2. Made the rule of never allowing both Writer and
   Composer/Lyricist/Librettist less strong. It is now 'should not', to allow
   editors to make use of their best judgement in deciding what best reflects
   the available information. (This was to address the situation in which the
   composer is known, but the lyricist is unclear)

The proposal is available at:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Writer_Relationship_Type
This RFV will expire on Thursday, October 14.

Thanks,
Jeroen
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to