Hi everyone, As the discussion on the previous RFV seems to have been resolved, I am resubmitting it for veto. Changes made since the first RFV:
1. Different example: a Jagger/Richards track, for which the individual contributions are unclear, and which do not yet have composer or lyricist ARs. 2. Made the rule of never allowing both Writer and Composer/Lyricist/Librettist less strong. It is now 'should not', to allow editors to make use of their best judgement in deciding what best reflects the available information. (This was to address the situation in which the composer is known, but the lyricist is unclear) The proposal is available at: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Writer_Relationship_Type This RFV will expire on Thursday, October 14. Thanks, Jeroen
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style