+1 on the RFV. Just taking a last look, one trivial thing popped out at me... One of the three examples specifically talks about the Writer AR. Maybe final passage of this RFV should be contingent upon the Writer AR passing RFV, so there's no issue with that example referencing an AR that doesn't (yet) exist?
Also, just for clarification, "It also adds a reference to this section to each of the relationship types mentioned below." - what is the actual text you intend to add to those ARs? Brian On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Jeroen Latour <f.j.lat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As all the active participants in the discussions have indicated they are > happy with the current state of the proposal, I am putting it forward for > RFV. > > The proposal would add guidelines to the Advanced Relationship Style page > on when to use the generic types of relationship, and when it's more > appropriate to use a more specific type of relationship. > The guidelines build on two principles: > > 1. Comply or explain. The editor should use the specific relationship > types, or otherwise explain his or her reasons in the edit note and an > annotation. > 2. Trust editor judgement. The guideline does not force the editor to > use the more specific types. Instead, it says the editor should attempt to > deduce, but to stay on the safe side. > > These guidelines were first discussed in relation to the Writer AR RFC > (which I will push to RFV4 in the coming days, barring any veto on this), > but apply to similar AR types, including Arranger, Engineer, Engineer > Position and Performer, and their subtypes. The proposal also adds a > reference on the pages for each of those generic types, to point editors to > this guideline. > > The details of this proposal are available at: > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Prefer_Specific_Relationship_Types > This RFV will expire on 19 December 2010. > > I'm feeling good about this one. > > Take care, > Jeroen > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
