Everyone involved in the latest discussions agreed with moving to RFV. Do you feel we need a round of RFC first?
- Jeroen Op 24 dec. 2010 om 17:34 heeft "Paul C. Bryan" <em...@pbryan.net> het volgende geschreven: > Point of order: shouldn't this be an RFC? > > On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 16:56 +0100, Jeroen Latour wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> Step 2 of 2. Now that the Prefer Specific Relationship Types guideline >> is official, I am resubmitting the Writer AR proposal for RFV. >> >> >> Changes since last time. >> 1. Moved most of the guidelines governing when to use the >> specific types to the new Prefer Specific Relationship Types >> guideline. >> 2. Added a clear reference to the Preferer Specific Relationship >> Type guideline. >> 3. Added many examples, illustrating the effect of the Preferer >> Specific Relationship Type guideline. >> The proposal is available >> at: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Writer_Relationship_Type >> Because of the holidays, this RFV will expire on Tuesday, January 5. >> That should give everyone plenty of time. >> >> >> I hope everyone enjoys the holidays, and for those in a culture that >> don't celebrate any holidays, I hope that you enjoy the peace and >> quiet on the style mailinglist. :-) >> >> >> Regards, >> Jeroen >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
