Simon Reinhardt wrote: > > Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: >>> On to recordings: >>> All tracks that have been uploaded will always be available for >>> streaming so as a general type that will always work. But if something's >>> also available for download I'd rather want to see that used because >>> being able to download music is better than just being able to stream >>> it. And if something's offered under a CC licence I'd use the CC >>> relationship type. >>> In my eyes it's quite clear what to use for recordings and we don't >>> need a new type. What do you think? >> >> I can agree with this. Although it's possible (and kinda common) to >> limit the number of downloads (for example, 100 free downloads) and >> leave it as just a streaming afterwards… > > Ah, I didn't know that. Is that N free downloads overall (first come, > first served) or per user? > I believe it's on a first-come, first-served basis.
>>> Oh and: You can also create sets of tracks and I have seen them used as >>> folders for albums - so maybe we'd want to relate set URLs to release >>> groups in some cases? >> >> I would link them to releases, not release groups. Although we maybe >> could use the same stuff as for recordings there. > > Why releases rather than release groups? I think that with releases being > as specific as they are now a set in SoundCloud would apply to many > different releases. Not all of them maybe though... > > Regards, > Simon > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/SoundCloud-URL-relationships-tp3593834p3602393.html Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
