I like this criteria of selection. //[bnw] On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Alex Mauer <ha...@hawkesnest.net> wrote: > On 07/05/2011 04:35 PM, Simon Reinhardt wrote: >>> So if a release has two different packaging types, it should be placed >>> in neither of them? That doesn’t make much sense to me. >> >> *shrug* Neither does this innermost rule to me. :-) > > It’s really very very simple: put the release in the packaging that > holds it. > > Examples: > As mentioned previously on the list, we have the cassette single with a > 4-sided slip case. 1 Medium, 1 packaging type, very simple. > > This release[1], 4 jewel cases inside a 5-sided slipcase. Since the > mediums are each in a different jewel case, it’s not correct to say that > the entire release is in a jewel case, so we need to look at the > packaging that covers the entire release: a slipcase. > > This release[2], 1 jewel case (on right, liner notes bottom middle) > inside a slipcase (top left). 1 medium, 2 packaging types. Since the > jewel case is the innermost and holds the one medium, use that. If at > some point MB gains multiple packaging types per release, we can use > both types. > >> No, I meant criteria for adding new types of packaging. > > Oh, OK. I’m pretty sure we have the RFC/RFV system for that. > > —Alex Mauer “hawke” > > 1. http://991.com/Buy/ProductInformation.aspx?StockNumber=140284 > 2. http://img.mercadolivre.com.br/jm/img?s=MLB&f=168653329_6493.jpg&v=E > > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
