Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Jim DeLaHunt <from.nabble@> wrote: > ... >> By the way, I think the process is that you should create a proposal page >> with an RFC number for adding this site to the whitelist, following the >> instructions at http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposals#Special_Procedures >> . I >> didn't see an RFC number in this thread. > > :) RFC numbers are not really used too often because they're seen as > kind of a PITA, especially for small things like this - I mean, does > it make sense to make people actually add a wiki page and all for such > a small thing? It can all be added to the whitelist when/if it passes, > which sounds like the only wiki page important enough to change... >
I love the idea of making a simpler, lightweight process for simple changes. Unfortunately, neither the rules for the regular process http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposals#Process_for_Idea_Champions , nor the special procedures for "Has Lyrics At" http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposals#Special_Procedures offers that possibility. Interestingly, the regular process does not call for assigning numbers to RFCs either. It should; I think numbers are a good way to track and refer to RFCs. We do our editors a disservice when we change the process without changing the written description of the process. We end up with a system that you can only participate in if you live on mb-style. And I know of many good editors who would rather not live on mb-style. -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz-mailing-lists.2986109.n2.nabble.com/RFC-Add-kasi-time-com-to-the-Lyrics-whitelist-tp7023016p7044811.html Sent from the Style discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
