Thx...
----- Original Message -----
From: Frederic Da Vitoria
To: MusicBrainz Style Discussion
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [mb-style] RFC-347: CSG update for NGS
2012/1/25 pabouk <pab...@centrum.cz>
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote
> 2012/1/24, pabouk <pabouk@>:
>>> Yes, tagging is important to bring new users to MB. But using the
>>> disambiguation field would not necessarily break it. It depends on how
>>> the interface presents the data to client applications. Plus the
>>> change would not necessarily break tagging.
>>>
>> We will need at least a plug-in for Picard (if it is realizable by a
>> plug-in).
>
> Probably, but not necessarily: the API could return the concatenation
> of the title and the comment. This may be a bad idea fr other reasons,
> but at least we should check.
>
The API should not be changed such a non-systematic way
just to avoid changing applications.
If we were only to consider MB applications such as Picard, I would agree
with you. But I believe we should also think of the non-MB applications.
Keeping previous functionality is IMO important, applications and systems who
don't are often not well considered.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nessun virus nel messaggio.
Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com
Versione: 10.0.1416 / Database dei virus: 2109/4764 - Data di rilascio:
24/01/2012
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
