symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm sceptical to if introducing a "release composer" field is a realistic > solution. I suppose it has to be applied to the whole of mb & also show up > as a column in searches, otherwise we reintroduce the release > disambiguation problem (by remove performers or composer from the artist > field). > And it still doesn't help for multiple composers: > > Artist: Juliard string quartet / Emerson Quartet > Composer: Brahms / Mendelssohn > > I believe we should use ARs & work info that's already available to get > better tags/file sorting. The "album artist" isn't really a concept > intended for classical anyway. > > /symphonick
Fair enough. Then why the heck are we trying to come up with a standard for what to put in the artist field? The scaling problems for multiple artists/composers in a release are strictly worse. Could it be autogenerated from ARs? Rupert
pgpHkqV4rTVo1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
