Yeah, that sounds about right, except in instances where the original creator(s) brought someone else in.
Sent from my iPhone On Mar 4, 2013, at 10:51 AM, symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/3/4 Alex Mauer <ha...@hawkesnest.net> >> On 3/4/2013 4:24 AM, symphonick wrote: >> > Great! Proposal updated. Can I get a +1 ? >> >> One very minor change: >> >> "different revisions of a work by one single artist": "one single" is >> redundant. I would suggest "the original writer" I think, for this. >> >> Other possibilities: >> * "a single artist" (implies that the work has to have been a creation >> of one artist working alone, which is not correct) >> * "the original composer (implies that revised lyrics do not count, >> which is not correct) >> * "the original composer or lyricist" (some people might read this as >> 'one or the other but not both' -- 'and/or' would help there but I think >> that gets a little long.) > > How about "the original artist"? or "artist(s)" > "Candle in the Wind" has more than a single creator. > > /symphonick > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
