On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:42 PM, MeinDummy <meindu...@nurfuerspam.de> wrote:
> -1 > > The proposed change in the guideline may result in tracks being credited to > the release artist even though it is well known that another artist is the > performer. > Indeed, that would seem to be the point of artist credits, to credit who's credited. For the actual performer, why not use relationships + recording artist as proposed? This is contrary to the majority opinion in RFV-333: Unify track/recording > guidelines > < > http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-333-Unify-track-recording-guidelines-td3722980.html > > > that tracklists are not our vehicle for reproducing release contents "as on > cover". > Note that RFV-333's point was to merge both so that we had _a clear starting point_ and could later decide what should and shouldn't deviate, not to forever block this changing. -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
