pabouk wrote > I think that the examples section on the recording definition page should > contain examples of recording made by the same interpreters but as a > different performance (recorded at different time). IMHO this could be one > of the most common mistakes during recording mergers. > > I could offer one relatively well-known example of very different > interpretations of Bach's Goldberg Variations by the same pianist - Glenn > Gould: > year 1955: > http://musicbrainz.org/recording/7fb6932b-f2df-44f2-b0a6-e419c3aa429c > year 1981: > http://musicbrainz.org/recording/4cf2bb2e-a4de-461c-905c-eb0c739fd6cc > > I have chosen the Variation 6 because of the small difference in lengths > between the two interpretations.
I've added this example now, let me know if there's anything wrong with it. -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-208-New-Recordings-Guidelines-tp4651054p4651880.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
