Tom Crocker wrote >> Like I said, I don't think we're going to agree! > What if the signals from a synth go to a recorder?
Perhaps "A captured sound, a captured signal from a synthesiser, or the product of mixing or editing". Such a case causes the same problem under the current definition. Tom Crocker wrote > Part of, but not *the* definition What is part of but not *the* definition? -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-208-New-Recordings-Guidelines-tp4651054p4652181.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
