On Jul 6, 2013, at 4:41 AM, Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You make a good point that we should be thinking about a video recording > entity that's separate to the audio recording. That would be the correct way > to structure the database > I mentioned that a while back in this thread. Nikki told me a long time ago that there were plans to include video recordings in the future. Shall we chalk up a plan to create a "video" attribute for recordings? Currently there's only a video attribute for the "Stream for free" AR. > On Jul 5, 2013 9:00 PM, "Ben Ockmore" <ben.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > If a DVD has a video track which has identical audio to a track on a CD, I > don't see why we should use different recordings. Recordings represent audio > - why does video even come into it? > > I definitely wouldn't support marking any MB recordings as videos, because > that's not what the entity is meant to represent. If that functionality is > required then another entity should be used. > > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
