We don't have a system now; IMO there's no point in creating a temporary system. It's also (again IMO) one of the most complicated areas of classical titles, I'm unsure about the example I just added :-( . I tried "only use part numbers by the composer" in my last attempt at a classical title guideline, the downside being that you'll have to use the disambiguation field for something like "Allegro (1st movement)" & "Allegro (3rd movement)".
2013/10/23 Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com> > 2013/10/23 Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com> > >> 2013/10/23 symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> >> >>> Think this proposal will pass before the ordering system is in place? :-) >>> >>> 2013/10/23 Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> 2013/10/23 symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> I've rewritten the proposal. >>>>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Symphonick/Work_titles >>>>> >>>> >>>> You wrote it as if the ordering system was due tomorrow :-) >>>> >>>> >> Well, unless we take months to decide about Works titles, I don't see how >> a schema change which hasn't yet been implemented can arrive sooner :-( >> > > Last schema change was about 1 week ago, so I guess we could expect AR > numbering for spring 2014. If we agree no what should be done and manage to > convince the devs that it should be part of the next schema change. > > 6 months is a lot of time. Maybe you should allow for a fallback numbering > system in your guideline, until the "physical" numbering is implemented. > > -- > Frederic Da Vitoria > (davitof) > > Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - > http://www.april.org > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > -- /symphonick
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
