Doesn't a 2xCD release in a jewel case say the same thing?
On Mar 11, 2014 2:19 PM, "Marko" <markosults...@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, so I'd be fine with the new type being called "Standard Width Double
> Disc Jewel Case". Kind of long, but hopefully acceptable. Any
> opinions/objections from others?
>
> Marko Sultsing
> markosults...@gmail.com
>
>
> 2014-03-11 18:43 GMT+02:00 Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com>:
>
>>
>> On 10 Mar 2014 22:28, "Marko" <markosults...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm not really trying to add every packaging variation, but I do think
>> this is common and distinct enough to warrant an entry.
>>
>> No I appreciate you aren't but someone else might think the same about
>> clear/black tray for example. I don't know from what has been said so far
>> exactly what a brilliant box is and how or why we'd distinguish it from
>> others with a hinged tray for 2 discs.
>>
>> > OK, so let's say we go with unified type for 2 disc jewel cases. I
>> don't like the idea for using the current "Jewel Case" (or a renamed one)
>> for it, as I still find the inside of the packaging to be an important part
>> of it. Would "double disc jewel case" be not enough to differentiate from
>> fatbox? If not, sure, add "standard width" to it.
>>
>> My worry without 'standard width' (and it isn't the worst thing that
>> could happen) is that people would choose it when they mean fat boxes,
>> because they haven't read all the explanations of packaging types and don't
>> know a fat box can be called that (which is also part of my problem with
>> brilliant box). Standard width would encourage them to go looking and find
>> the fat box. I guess it would be nice to have a short name for display and
>> a fully qualified name for picking but that's a whole other RFC / schema
>> change
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
>> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to