Doesn't a 2xCD release in a jewel case say the same thing? On Mar 11, 2014 2:19 PM, "Marko" <markosults...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, so I'd be fine with the new type being called "Standard Width Double > Disc Jewel Case". Kind of long, but hopefully acceptable. Any > opinions/objections from others? > > Marko Sultsing > markosults...@gmail.com > > > 2014-03-11 18:43 GMT+02:00 Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com>: > >> >> On 10 Mar 2014 22:28, "Marko" <markosults...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > I'm not really trying to add every packaging variation, but I do think >> this is common and distinct enough to warrant an entry. >> >> No I appreciate you aren't but someone else might think the same about >> clear/black tray for example. I don't know from what has been said so far >> exactly what a brilliant box is and how or why we'd distinguish it from >> others with a hinged tray for 2 discs. >> >> > OK, so let's say we go with unified type for 2 disc jewel cases. I >> don't like the idea for using the current "Jewel Case" (or a renamed one) >> for it, as I still find the inside of the packaging to be an important part >> of it. Would "double disc jewel case" be not enough to differentiate from >> fatbox? If not, sure, add "standard width" to it. >> >> My worry without 'standard width' (and it isn't the worst thing that >> could happen) is that people would choose it when they mean fat boxes, >> because they haven't read all the explanations of packaging types and don't >> know a fat box can be called that (which is also part of my problem with >> brilliant box). Standard width would encourage them to go looking and find >> the fat box. I guess it would be nice to have a short name for display and >> a fully qualified name for picking but that's a whole other RFC / schema >> change >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style