On 09/12/2014 05:09 AM, Tom Crocker wrote:
On 12 September 2014 09:24, KRSCuan <donc...@gmx.de
<mailto:donc...@gmx.de>> wrote:
For the 168-disc boxset that has
been linked to a few times, things would be clearer. But the box
and the
individual sets are already in the same RG. And the least the behemoth
needs is being clogged with 42 additional release-release
relationships
stating the obvious.
Yes, don't use such a relationship within release groups makes sense
(but all of this is not really relevant to this RFC/V)
/Should/ a box and it's components be in the same RG? That doesn't fit
my understanding of what an RG is.
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
