Approach B means that the loudest, most persistant and perhaps least social voice wins.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:01 PM, jeffrey <[email protected]> wrote: > i am now on a committee writing new bylaws for cbdc. > > there seem to be two opposing views on decision making. > A. a board be elected and it be responsible for making decisions. the board > can ask for general dancer input, but only the board can vote and make > operational decisions. > > B. that all meetings be public meetings, and everyone at the particular > meeting gets to vote on the decision. > > of course there are both tiny, medium, and large decisions to be made in the > course of time, and no distinction was offered. just the desire that all > members (or perhaps, anyone that shows up) be allowed to make all decisions. > > to me this obviates the whole point of a board: having a small group that > can retain focus, be responsible for decisions, be available for making > decisions on short notice. > > comments on the B approach? has anyone tried it? how did it go? > > Jeffrey > chicago > > > _______________________________________________ > Organizers mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/organizers >
