On 2011/02/14 13:11, Christopher Brannon <ch...@the-brannons.com> wrote: > > Why not use memset()? That would be more efficient. > > It would. The argument in favor of the static initializer approach is > that it does not assume that NULL == 0.
OK, now I understand what you mean, but I personally don't think that language lawyering with no real application to a real platform justifies the additional memory usage and code size. > I can resend a patch using memset, if you like. No, I think it's fine, it's just a very tiny difference, I was just curious why you did it this way. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Musicpd-dev-team mailing list Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team
