On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 08:01:14 +0200 Max Kellermann <m...@duempel.org> wrote:
> On 2013/08/07 04:19, Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Allocate the buffer as needed instead of relying on an arbitrary > > constant that might not be enough. > > That allocates a new buffer for each frame. I consider that > unnecessary overhead. not much more than the current code that does it for each packet (there's usually only one frame per packet), but yes this can be improved. let me resend a better patch. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Musicpd-dev-team mailing list Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team
