> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:12:10 +0200
> From: Christian Mondrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Werner Icking wrote:
> > http://www.gmd.de/Mail/mutex-archive/3357.html
>
> I had a few problems with this solution and ended up with another one
> provided during that discussion thread by Don Simons. [...]
> %%\def\cautna{\let\bignat\bigna\def\bigna##1{\cna{##1}\let\bigna\bignat}}
Yes, something was not perfect. Do you remember what is was?
But the above isn't perfect, too, because it assumes, that PMX only uses
\big.. e.g. \bigna. AFAIK PMX uses as well \na, \bigna, \smallna so a
complete solution has to obey all theses cases. My example ignores
this because I always use PMX's "Arb".
My proposal of \ctnry\ has the advantage, that it works with relative
accidentals, too, without having to think about whether e.g. "ff"
generates a natural or a flat or whether e.g. "fs" generates a sharp or a
natural.
-- Werner
