Bernhard Lang wrote:
> In the upper stave the rests (r9,
> length of a brevis) do not get placed above each other. Why? Did I make
> something wrong?
>
You did nothing wrong. You exposed a bug (thanks!) that I'll fix when I
get a chance. Meanwhile I would suggest recoding as follows:
b93 | e-r | b0.e | //
% ^
rb9 | e03 r2 b+ | b.c d b | /
%
\\\let\lft\liftPAuse\def\liftPAuse#1{\rlap{\lft{-2}}\
\\\lft1\let\liftPAuse\lft}\
r9+1 | r9+1 | r9+1 | /
> in the second bar
> the first two notes, which fall on top, do not get fully separated by the
> 'r' option (marked in the example). Moving the 'r' to the other of the two
> notes doesn't improve. Is there a way to solve this problem?
>
It looks like "r" is acting as it should, that is, it simply moves a
note by the width of a quarter note. If you had not entered "r" the two
notes would be on top of each other. You could move the other note to
the left one notehead width with "e", or you could move either or both
notes by an arbitrary amount with XS.
--Don Simons
