Hi All,
Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> > I failed to figure out if MusixTeX fonts are really available as Type 1.
> > In all places where they are mentioned, they are mentioned only as Type
> > 3, which may provide only a _theoretical_ interest for most of us. In
> > addition, [it seems that] I learned that only some particular font
> > packages are not free, and MusixTeX is not among them.
>
> Type 3 fonts (but not type 1) are available, and only on a Windows platform.
And the author says that according to his experiments Type 3 looks
better both on the screen and on the printer than Type 1. For me it
sounds at least surprising. Can one comment this?
Alexander
