On 2007-02-15 22:38:40 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Also, the locking strategy is determined at compile time, i.e. > dotlocking can be disabled if Mutt thinks it is useless for the > incoming mailbox. But if later things change (e.g. a change in > the incoming mailbox, or the use of other mailboxes), this can > lead to mailbox corruption. I don't think this problem has been > fixed.
If the locking strategy isn't consistent on a system, then it's fairly likely that mailbox corruption occurs -- mutt isn't the only party that locks and writes to mailboxes. I'm not sure, therefore, where precisely you see the problem that would need to be fixed inside mutt. -- Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
