Hi TAKIZAWA-san, Could you explain the difference between 1.5.6-assumed.1 (Christoph's one) and 1.5.14-assumed.1? I have a poor memory.
* Mon Feb 26 2007 TAKIZAWA Takashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:11:49PM -0800, > Brendan Cully wrote: > > > On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 00:04, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > > >assumed-charset might be a good idea too. > > > > > > http://svn.df7cb.de/debian/mutt/trunk/debian/patches/features/assumed-charset > > > > I've applied this one. > > The above-mentioned patch is very old. > New patches are the following three. > http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt+tamo.assumed_charset.1 > http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.attach_charset.1 > http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.linear_white_space.1 Maybe it is not enough to say "it's very old." Why should Brendan apply the new ones? Concerning "+tamo" part, I've forgotten most of what I did. But here are some: http://bugs.mutt.org/2218 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=110717251200761&w=2 These are, for some users (like Alain), quite serious changes. -- tamo
