* On 2007.03.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Kyle Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 ACL QUOTA LITERAL+ NAMESPACE UIDPLUS > > > >After (note there is no ACL capability here): > > > >CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 IDLE LOGIN-REFERRALS MAILBOX-REFERRALS > >NAMESPACE LITERAL+ UIDPLUS CHILDREN > > This is, well, stupid. Not only do they claim ACL support, but QUOTA > support as well.
I'm not sure I understand you. I surely don't mean to defend Mirapoint (we use them, and I'm not a fan by a long shot) but it is legitimate to offer different capabilities when authenticated than when not, no? I don't see why they *would* in this case, but to me it seems like they're not claiming to support ACL or QUOTA when authenticated. The patch seems to be quite correct. -- -D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] NSIT University of Chicago
