On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 05:31:56PM -0000, Mutt wrote: > #3364: index_format: subject length miscalculated after subject has changed > --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- > Reporter: dp | Owner: mutt-dev > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: minor | Milestone: > Component: mutt | Version: > Keywords: | > --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- > Hello, > > if the subject has changed, its length is miscalculated in index view when > viewing threads. > > I use: > set index_format=" %4C %Z %4M %s%* %-20.20n " > > An example: > > The subject of the first email is:[[BR]] > Subject: aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff ggg hhh iii jjj kkk lll mmm nnn[[BR]] > The subject of the second email is:[[BR]] > Subject: [ABCDE] aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff ggg hhh iii jjj kkk lll mmm > nnn[[BR]] > > The second email is a reply to the first. The index looks like this: > > 1 r F aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff ggg hhh iii jjj kkk Dennis > Preiser[[BR]] > 2 F `->[ABCDE] aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff ggg hhh iii jj Dennis > Preiser[[BR]]
Ui, looks strange. Here a 'clean' version: Both subjects: Subject: aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff ggg hhh iii jjj kkk lll mmm nnn Subject: [ABCDE] aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff ggg hhh iii jjj kkk lll mmm nnn My index_format: set index_format=" %4C %Z %4M %s%* %-20.20n " Result: 1 r F aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff ggg hhh iii jjj kkk Dennis Preiser 2 F `->[ABCDE] aaa bbb ccc ddd eee fff ggg hhh iii jj Dennis Preiser The second subject has to be cut of right before the first 'i'. > The subject of #1 is proper truncated but the subject of #2 is not. The > second subject has to be cut of earlier. Dennis
