#3607: gnus better at parsing RISKS Digest than mutt
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jidanni | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
Component: mutt | Version:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by aaron@…):
{{{
At 01:44 -0000 12 Dec 2012, Mutt <[email protected]> wrote:
So actually, you're saying the procmail is better at this. But for me,
using that command results in just a single message in a mailbox. To
actually separate it into separate messages you'd need to use the
formail program from the procmail suite. You should be able to use mutt
to read a mailbox produced in that manner as easily as you could use
gnus, so I don't see how gnus is better about it.
Mutt has never claimed to support plain text digests, such as that. The
only digests which mutt supports are messages with the multipart/digest
MIME type.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3607#comment:>
Mutt <http://www.mutt.org/>
The Mutt mail user agent
