On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:24:36 -0500, David Champion wrote: > * On 12 Mar 2013, Jiri Denemark wrote: > The code looks sound at a glance, and I agree it's a good idea -- but > I'm afraid that I have a much worse response. :( There's a patch for > this that's been around for several years. It's integrated with label > sorting and with a larger update to label use in general, and while I'd > like to push it I'd appreciate more feedback on it before doing so, and > simply haven't had time to follow through on soliciting it. > > https://bitbucket.org/dgc/mutt-keywords
Oh, I didn't know it existed. Mainly because it's not upstream. Is there any reason why it is not upstream when it it's been around for several years? > If there's any gap between the patch sequence at that URL and your code, > and you want to produce a patch based on my patch sequence to bring them > even, I'd be interested in including your changes (properly tagged as > yours, of course). It looks like your patch is doing all my patch can do and even in a similar way. That said I don't care which patch gets in as long as mutt supports this feature is supported in upstream mutt :-) I'm not a fan of third-party patches or even patchsets especially when this functionality does not seem to me as a controversial thing (unlike sidebar). Jirka
