On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:44:59PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > Simple question: Is there any reason why list-reply should not use > any List-Post headers to get the address to reply to? It seems like > this would obviate the need for users to manually configure lists they > were subscribed to, as long as they had appropriate headers...
Pretty sure it already does this. If you reply to a list with RFC 2369 headers, without a 'subscribe foo' in your mutt config, list-reply will already do the right thing. w
