On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 01:08:47PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:44:52PM -0400, Damien Riegel wrote:
> > struct mx_ops mx_pop_ops = {
> > + .probe = pop_probe,
> > .close = pop_close_mailbox,
> > };
>
> Isn't this initialization style a GNUism? I think we should avoid it.I looked at this too, but was surprised to find out this is in C99 (section 6.7.8). <http://c0x.coding-guidelines.com/6.7.8.html> We have AC_PROG_CC_C99 in our configure.ac, so I think it should be okay to start allowing some of the C99 changes in. Do you agree? -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
