On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:14:08AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:58:59PM +0300, Emanuele Giaquinta wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 08:20:38PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > I'll put this on my list of things to look at. To be honest, if Michael > > > wasn't convinced, my pre-disposition will be against, but I'll look more > > > closely when I get some time. > > > > Ok. I don't understand why you have this negative bias based on no > > followup from Michael though. > > Well, because that's not what you said. You said you did receive a > round of feedback, but then he stopped responding.
Yes, I meant no followup after the first round of feedback. > I can't find the thread in the mutt-dev archive, so if you have a > pointer to the conversation that might be useful. It seems that I did not send the mail to mutt-dev. I can provide you with the conversation. > I wasn't around for any conversations about the Lines and Content-Length > headers, but since it never was addressed I can only imagine there must > have been quite lengthy arguments and it's one of the topics everyone > grew tired of arguing about. Reopening old flamewars isn't something > I'm keen to do a few months into becoming maintainer. :-/ There was no flamewar and I have no interest in creating one :) I think that no one was interested enough in looking into this. Emanuele
