On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 06:04:59PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 05:09:46AM +0300, Alexander Gromnitsky wrote:
>> -body { margin-left:2%; margin-right:2%; font-family:serif; }
>> +@media (min-width: 768px) {
>> + body { width: 767px; margin: 0 auto; }
>> +}
>> +body { font-family:serif; }
>> .toc, .list-of-tables, .list-of-examples { font-family:sans-serif; }
>> h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family:sans-serif; }
>> p { text-align:justify; }
> I'm not well-versed on CSS issues--what is the effect of this change
> (and the several related changes) on small screens, say a cell phone
> screen held in portrait orientation?
Quite a crappy one, for, for example, in many Android phones the
hard-wired default viewport is ~980px.
Perhaps it would be beneficial to add
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
to `mutt.xsl` to ask a browser to use an "ideal" viewport of the
device.
