Hi Kevin,
* On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 12:36PM -0700 Kevin J. McCarthy ([email protected]) muttered:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:56:22AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > If you feel comfortable patching and testing, I'd appreciate to know if
> > that fixes it for you. Regardless, I will take a closer look and apply
> > that patch myself later today.
>
> I'm attaching a patch that's just a slightly different version of the
> one I mentioned.
seems to work. At least I can read (decrypt) the messages now.
Thanks a lot!
[-- The following data is S/MIME encrypted --]
[-- Begin signature information --]
Good signature from:
1.2.840.113549.1.9.1=#6D69636861656C2E7461746765406D63666573732D69742E636F6D
aka: <michael.tatge@XXX>
created: Wed Mar 21 20:30:18 2018
[-- End signature information --]
[-- The following data is S/MIME signed --]
[Body]
[-- End of S/MIME signed data --]
[-- End of S/MIME encrypted data --]
Nice!
One minor glitch:
1. set crypt_verify_sig=ask-no
Open a s/mime signed or signed and encrypted message.
Mutt asks: "Verify PGP signature? ([no]/yes):"
Maybe we should generalize that as "Verify signature?"
Patch attached. Translations would still need to be adapted.
* On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 10:56AM -0700 Kevin J. McCarthy ([email protected]) muttered:
> https://dev.gnupg.org/T2919
> https://github.com/neomutt/neomutt/pull/662
Oh, yes i forgot to mention outlook was involved.
Michael
--
PGP-Key-ID: 0xDE3C3D3BEEE7D043
Jabber: [email protected]
--- a/commands.c 2018-03-22 13:16:18.145433278 +0100
+++ b/commands.c 2018-03-22 13:16:55.512429616 +0100
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
else if (cur->security & SIGN)
{
/* find out whether or not the verify signature */
- if (query_quadoption (OPT_VERIFYSIG, _("Verify PGP signature?")) == MUTT_YES)
+ if (query_quadoption (OPT_VERIFYSIG, _("Verify signature?")) == MUTT_YES)
{
cmflags |= MUTT_CM_VERIFY;
}
