On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 04:00:55AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-06-11 08:07:22 +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > What if instead, we changed the code from a ">" comparison to a "!=" > > comparison. This would force a rescan if the mtime were reset backwards: > > I'll have to try. But I'm wondering why there is no rescan after one > does a sync-mailbox with actual changes: in any case, this may be > necessary as new mail could arrive during this time.
So, in effect, remove the call to maildir_update_mtime() at the end of mh_sync_mailbox()? -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
