On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 09:44:18PM -0800, David Champion wrote: > I'm certainly willing to remain to the extent that I have been, but we need > there to be more people. I have code I technically could push, but I'd > rather have review and commentary on it because I know that for all the > hours I've put into it, it's not really enough to have one veteran who's > been semi-retired for 10 years thinking about it alone in a cabin.
I last posted a, (admittedly trivial), patch to this list in 2023: https://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=170152151102894&w=2 ... and got no response whatsoever. Although having said that, since there didn't seem to be an active development community here, on the few occasions that I've seen patches posted to this list I've just done a cursory glance through them and finding nothing obviously wrong never bothered to reply either, presuming that somebody else more involved with the mutt project will pick up on it. > But we also have to ask and answer: is that what mutt users want? Or is the > community satisfied with maintenance mode and low growth? Well, maintenance mode and low growth doesn't sound like so much of a problem as an almost silent development mailing list does.
