Crystal Kolipe via Mutt-dev wrote in <[email protected]>: ...
(murderer style citation skipped.) |[.] although that seems like a niche case. Must be said though that dkim is per-domain, so you seem to support "the other approach" that seems to have the desire to add support for forbidding "explosion" meaning mailing-list targets? I for one am totally against this, the "iterated DKIM" should not introduce anything like that. It should be a cryptographic helper of SMTP that allows to link a message to a domain, no tracking, no flow control, nothing. Only being able to crypt-verify, however, up to the original sender, which is new (anyway). --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
