On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 09:35:10AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2026-06-01 06:58:10 +0200, Rene Kita wrote:
I would suspect historical reasons for using 'users', mail(1) does use
the same terminology here:

     -c list
                  Send carbon copies to list of users. [...]

Would be interesting to know, if it is because Unix is a multi-user
system and mail was primarily used to send email to other users.  Or if
the idea is just that in the end it's a user who receives the email.  I
like the version using 'users', it feels more personal.

E-mail addresses may be mailing-list addresses or addresses
to be handled entirely by software (e.g. subscription or BTS
addresses), so I would say that "users" can be misleading.

I agree 'users' feels warmer, but Vincent is right. The commit (86700b01) also came from a mutt translator, and translators usually have good instincts about preciseness of words, so I'm inclined to fix the ~t help to say addresses too.

--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to