On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 11:18:18AM +0200, Rene Kita wrote:
I don't like this. I'd would add a new function, e.g.
mutt_rfc1524_expand_draftname and wrap the original functionality inside
a static _mutt_rfc1524_expand_filename. Dealing with such flag
parameters tends to get ugly over time.

Of course, names are up to discussion. :-)

Okay.  Honestly I didn't like it either, it was just quick and easy :).

I'll wrap a separate function.  Thanks Rene.

--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to