On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:57:54AM +0200, Stefan Leupers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:04:17AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> > When replying to a message, after entering vi, when doing :wq within
> > 1 second (or actually in the same second, I think) mutt thinks it
> > should abort because the message is unmodified.
>
> It's not a bug, it's a feature!
>
> If You don't want this just type "set abort_unmodified=no" in Your .muttrc
> file.
>
> I think that it is quite usefull to have this set "yes", because it avoids
> sending empty mails. But I have to admit that during my testing phase of
> mutt I did have the same thoughts, because for test mails all You want to
> have is a mail (content doesn't matter, signature is enough). In real life
> You will never need to send empty mails.
Not necessarily emtpy, but unmodified happens. Any ezmlm mailinglist will ask me to
just reply to the message, it doesn't care what's in there, only the address matters.
I don't like to wait for a second there. Since I'm also a subscription moderator, I
get 5-6 of these mails a day and growing..
Greetz, Peter.
--
.| Peter van Dijk | <mo|VERWEG> stoned worden of coden
.| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | <mo|VERWEG> dat is de levensvraag
| <mo|VERWEG> coden of stoned worden
| <mo|VERWEG> stonend worden En coden
| <mo|VERWEG> hmm
| <mo|VERWEG> dan maar stoned worden en slashdot lezen:)
